It accurately reproduces some of the restrained but anguished debate from the secret tapes, and it intersperses extraordinarily realistic footage of Soviet missile sites being hurriedly readied in jungle clearings, of American U-2s swooping over them, and of bombers, carrier aircraft, and U.
But two aspects of the movie grossly distort reality.
They were in fact transporting nuclear missiles to Cuba when they promised that they were not. This is a set-up. In the book, it starts off with a meeting of the President and most of the cabinet. However, the Turkish missiles would be removed in a short time after the Cuban missiles were removed.
Ask students to rank their responses in terms of their overall enjoyment of the film on the Thinking Critically about a Movie Adaptation: Americans tend to write history solipsistically, as if all things good and evil are made in the U.
It makes no attempt to suggest why Khrushchev decided to sneak the missiles into Cuba or, in the end, to pull them out. This is the way it really was, the filmmakers implicitly promise with those fine points: They talked about the same subject, the Soviets helping the Cubans.
Robert Kennedy had a meeting with Ambassador Dobrynin and told him about the deal that the United States was willing to make in order to remove the missiles from Cuba.
Vice President Lyndon B. By the end of the movie, you half expect the generals to start talking, Dr. The crisis for Kennedy had very little to do with Cuba and much to do with the commitment he had inherited to protect two-and-a-half million West Berliners.
R made and how they reached this compromise. Pass out copies of the Thinking Critically about a Movie Adaptation: Preferences and Effects handout. Other students will see the same change as trivial, but feel it was a poor choice.
In the case of Thirteen Days, the writer and producers and director were so struck by the nature of the historical record itself that they felt it was unwise to range widely from it. It recalls vividly a confrontation in which nuclear war was really possible, reminding us of an enduring truth about the nuclear age.
It allows the audience to experience vicariously the irreducible uncertainties, frustrating foul-ups, and paralyzing fear of failure in deciding about actions that could trigger reactions that killed million fellow citizens. The one and only safeguard for West Berliners was the U.
I should also add that after I read the script, I sent the director some suggestions, and in October Zelikow and I and a number of others were invited to a prescreening in Washington, D. Thirteen Days is many times more gripping.
The movie contains several similarities with the book. The movie skews many small points and a few large ones. Kennedy and Andrei Gromyko. My book on the Missile Crisis, Essence of Decision, offers a Roshamon-like account of the actual events, highlighting ways in which the lens through which one views the facts shapes what one sees.
How faithful is the movie to the central truths about this historical event?
The movie gets this right where so many histories have not. Published in Chronicle of Higher Education February 2, It is almost the same in the movie. For years now, movies have either trivialized the office The American President, Dick, and Wag the Dog or represented it as a weak institution surrounded by sinister centers of secret power JFK.
Allow students time to plan the text for their booklet. My verdict on its accuracy is mixed. Rather, it is a dramatization.
The film is correct in showing high tension between the president and his uniformed advisers. This put immense pressure on top of both the United States and the Soviet Union to try and resolve this conflict, or to go to war. Thirteen Days is not a substitute for history.Feb 09, · The Great Gatsby comparison between book and movie The difference between the developing way of books and movies is magnificently huge because the way of emotion transmitting is different; the movie is based on vision, while the book is based on words.
Now, we did actually spend some time comparing and contrasting the book with the movie, but this was still a little bit of a cop-out. Really, I just needed some time to play catch up, and a movie was the easiest way to get some extra time. To prepare for the task, review the Book and Movie Comparison/Contrast Guide.
Using the handout as a guide, ask students, independently or in small groups, to discuss the changes they like most and least as well as the aspects of the film that remained true to the text that were most satisfying.
Thirteen Days Essays: OverThirteen Days Essays, Thirteen Days Term Papers, Thirteen Days Research Paper, Book Reports. ESSAYS, term and research papers available for UNLIMITED access. "Thirteen Days", written by Robert F. Kennedy, is an account of the Cuban Missile Crisis based on the view of Robert F.
Kennedy. This book contains Kennedy's thoughts about the Cuban Missile Crisis and the actions that he and the rest of the United States cabinet took to prevent a.
These resources will help your students think more critically when comparing and contrasting a book with its movie counterpart. Use this resource over and over again with ANY book that has a movie 4/5().Download